phfun World approves UN rules for carbon trading between nations at COP29
BAKUphfun, Azerbaijan — New rules allowing wealthy polluting countries to buy carbon-cutting “offsets” from developing nations were agreed at UN climate talks on Nov. 23—a move already raising fears they will be used to greenwash climate targets.
This decision, taken during extra time at the COP29 conference, is a major step forward in a debate that has dragged through climate talks for years, and diplomats broke into applause when the decision was gaveled.
Supporters say a UN-backed framework for carbon trading could direct investment to developing nations where many credits are generated.
Article continues after this advertisementCritics fear that if set up poorly, these schemes could undermine the world’s efforts to curb global warming.
FEATURED STORIES GLOBALNATION South Korea scrambles jets as Chinese, Russian warplanes approach GLOBALNATION Singapore hangs 4th person in three weeks GLOBALNATION Starbucks coffee and a glimpse of a North Korean mountain villageREAD: Brazil will not ‘shy away’ from fossil fuels issue as COP30 host – envoy
An Lambrechts from Greenpeace said the agreement delivered “carbon markets with loopholes and a lack of integrity” that would allow fossil-fuel companies to keep polluting.
Article continues after this advertisementReuben Manokara of WWF said the final text was “a compromise” and though not perfect it provided “a degree of clarity that has long been absent” from global efforts to regulate carbon trading.
Article continues after this advertisementCarbon credits are generated by activities that reduce or avoid planet-heating greenhouse gas emissions, such as planting trees, protecting existing carbon sinks, or replacing polluting coal with clean-energy alternatives.
Article continues after this advertisementUntil now, these credits have mainly been traded by companies on an unregulated market dogged by scandal.
But the 2015 Paris climate deal envisaged that countries could also take part in a cross-border trade of carbon reductions.
Article continues after this advertisementThe broad idea is that countries—mainly wealthy polluters—can buy carbon credits from other nations that are doing better on their own emissions-cutting targets.
Article 6The initiative, known as Article 6, includes both direct country-to-country trading and a separate UN-backed marketplace.
It has proved popular with both developing countries looking for international financing, and wealthier nations eager to find new ways to meet steep emissions-reduction targets.
The European Union and the United States pushed for an agreement at COP29 in Azerbaijan’s capital Baku. Many developing nations, particularly in Asia and Africa, have already signed up for projects.
As of earlier this month, more than 90 deals have already been agreed between nations for over 140 pilot projects, according to the UN.
But so far only one trade has happened between countries, involving Switzerland buying credits linked to a new fleet of electric buses in Thailand’s capital Bangkok.
Switzerland has other agreements lined up with Vanuatu and Ghana, while other buyer countries include Singapore, Japan and Norway.
The Climate Action Tracker project has warned that Switzerland’s lack of transparency over its own emissions cuts risks “setting a bad precedent.”
Niklas Hohne of NewClimate Institute, one of the groups behind the project, warned there was a concern that the market will create an incentive for developing countries to underpromise emission cuts in their own national plans so they can sell credits from any reductions that go above this level.
“There’s big motivation on both sides to do it wrong,” he said.
Injy Johnstone, a researcher specializing in carbon neutrality at Oxford University, told AFP the fact that nations can set their own standards in these country-to-country deals was a major concern.
She said overall the risk of greenwashing makes Article 6 “the biggest threat to the Paris agreement.”
Alongside this decentralized, state-to-state system, there will be another UN-run system for trading carbon credits, open to both states and companies.
“There are many projects waiting” for the market, Andrea Bonzanni of the IETA International Emissions Trading Association, told AFP. The IETA has more than 300 members including energy giants such as BP.
Erika Lennon of the Center for International Environmental Law said it would be necessary to make sure these markets do not create “even more problems and more scandals than the voluntary carbon markets.”
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
These “voluntary” markets have been rocked by scandals in recent years amid accusations that some credits sold did not reduce emissions as promisedphfun, or that projects exploited local communities.
READ NEXT Indonesia’s Prabowo vows to retire all fossil fuel plants in... Malaysia launching 1st solid-state hydrogen reactor next year EDITORS' PICK Artist Maria Angelica Tan explores what it means to be a Chinese Filipina in an ever-growing world PBA: Standhardinger rights can stay with Terrafirma despite retirement Andrea del Rosario recalls meeting Vin Diesel, being invited to his parties VP Sara Duterte no-show at NBI, asks for rescheduling EXPLAINER: What is a nuisance candidate? Manila Water to customers: Include septic tank desludging in holiday checklist MOST READ Comelec junks plea of 18 nuisance bets, one of them to seek SC's help South Korea scrambles jets as Chinese, Russian warplanes approach Taguba says he never changed tune on Paolo Duterte BIZ BUZZ: Power couple’s Polo Club bid foiled Follow @FMangosingINQ on Twitter --> View comments